Unbreakable Disease
2020-02-01 11:07:00 UTC
Many have fell into a lie that iPhones/smartphones are intentionally
designed to be addictive. *No* they aren't. An iPhone/smartphone doesn’t
directly act upon brain circuitry. But we can easily become dependent on
using it the way we might become dependent on wanting chocolate. When
people say they’re addicted to using their iPhone, what they really mean
is that they want the reward and feel they need this reward.
Apple's business model isn't to keep you looking at your screens for as
long as possible. Same applies to Samsung, Huawei (*DON'T* BUY), and
pretty much any smartphone device manufacturer. They ain't Facebook,
Twitter, Snapchat, etc. So yes, it's safe to assume that addictive
nature of iPhones/smartphones is unintentional. However, not so with
social media apps.
In fact, in compilance with the instructions recommended by Center for
Humane Technology (http://humanetech.com) they are attempting to solve
this problem with features such as Screen Time, but if you can't control
your gadget usage, you probably shouldn't own any gadgets.
STill don't believe me?
At the turn of the millenium, Nokia candy bar phones showed up on the
market (those with Snake game), which were more addictive than old bag
phones. Then Motorola flip phones came, which were more addictive than
Nokia phones. Then BlackBerry's came, which were more addictive than
Motorola phones. Then iPhone came, which is more addictive than BlackBerry.
It doesn't take above-average IQ to figure out that each new generation
of a mobile phone was more addictive.
TL;DR? Let me sort cell phones from least addictive to most addictive:
Bag phones > Nokia candy bar phones > Motorola flip phones > BlackBerry
designed to be addictive. *No* they aren't. An iPhone/smartphone doesn’t
directly act upon brain circuitry. But we can easily become dependent on
using it the way we might become dependent on wanting chocolate. When
people say they’re addicted to using their iPhone, what they really mean
is that they want the reward and feel they need this reward.
Apple's business model isn't to keep you looking at your screens for as
long as possible. Same applies to Samsung, Huawei (*DON'T* BUY), and
pretty much any smartphone device manufacturer. They ain't Facebook,
Twitter, Snapchat, etc. So yes, it's safe to assume that addictive
nature of iPhones/smartphones is unintentional. However, not so with
social media apps.
In fact, in compilance with the instructions recommended by Center for
Humane Technology (http://humanetech.com) they are attempting to solve
this problem with features such as Screen Time, but if you can't control
your gadget usage, you probably shouldn't own any gadgets.
STill don't believe me?
At the turn of the millenium, Nokia candy bar phones showed up on the
market (those with Snake game), which were more addictive than old bag
phones. Then Motorola flip phones came, which were more addictive than
Nokia phones. Then BlackBerry's came, which were more addictive than
Motorola phones. Then iPhone came, which is more addictive than BlackBerry.
It doesn't take above-average IQ to figure out that each new generation
of a mobile phone was more addictive.
TL;DR? Let me sort cell phones from least addictive to most addictive:
Bag phones > Nokia candy bar phones > Motorola flip phones > BlackBerry
iPhone
--
Tip me: bc1qtwmjzywve5v7z6jzk4dkg7v6masw2erpahsn9f
bitcoin:bc1qtwmjzywve5v7z6jzk4dkg7v6masw2erpahsn9f
Tip me: bc1qtwmjzywve5v7z6jzk4dkg7v6masw2erpahsn9f
bitcoin:bc1qtwmjzywve5v7z6jzk4dkg7v6masw2erpahsn9f